Question Description

I’m working on a philosophy discussion question and need support to help me study.

Hello, everything Is explained below . you have to answer the discussion questions plus the reading review questions .

After watching the “Wireless Philosophy” videos regarding Utilitarianism, please state (in about 3-4 sentences) whether you believe Robert Nozick’s “Utility Monster” thought-experiment presents a serious problem for Utilitarianism. Please explain your reasoning

Reading Review

Note: Response for Reading Review questions should be at least three complete sentences in length!

1. How does Mill respond to those who refer to Utilitarianism as a swinish doctrine? (Hint: See section 3)

2. How does Mill distinguish between higher and lower pleasures? (Hint: See Section 4.)

3. How does Mill explain the fact that some people choose lower pleasures over higher pleasures even though they might be capable of both? (Hint: See Section 5.)

pleasures even though they might be capable of both? (Hint: See Section 5.)3. How does Mill explain the fact that some people choose lower pleasures over higher pleasures even though they might be capable of both? (Hint: See Section 5.)Section 3.)2. How does Mill distinguish between higher and lower pleasures? (Hint: See Section 4.)3. How does Mill explain the fact that some people choose lower pleasures over higher pleasures even though they might be capable of both? (Hint: See Section 5.)The reading for this week will be pages 156-168 from GT.1. How does Mill respond to those who refer to Utilitarianism as a swinish doctrine? (Hint: See Section 3.)2. How does Mill distinguish between higher and lower pleasures? (Hint: See Section 4.)3. How does Mill explain the fact that some people choose lower pleasures over higher pleasures even though they might be capable of both? (Hint: See Section 5.)

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Executive Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Executive Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Executive Papers is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Executive Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

PHIL 1200 MCC The Utility Monster Wireless Philosophy Video Analysis Discussion

PHIL 1200 MCC The Utility Monster Wireless Philosophy Video Analysis Discussion

Question Description

After watching the “Wireless Philosophy” videos regarding Utilitarianism, please state (in about 3-4 sentences) whether you believe Robert Nozick’s “Utility Monster” thought-experiment presents a serious problem for Utilitarianism. Please explain your reasoning

Reading Review

Note: Response for Reading Review questions should be at least three complete sentences in length!

1. How does Mill respond to those who refer to Utilitarianism as a swinish doctrine? (Hint: See section 3)

2. How does Mill distinguish between higher and lower pleasures? (Hint: See Section 4.)

3. How does Mill explain the fact that some people choose lower pleasures over higher pleasures even though they might be capable of both? (Hint: See Section 5.)

Our Service Charter

Format and Features

Our Advantages

Useful Links

PHIL 1200 MCC The Utility Monster Wireless Philosophy Video Analysis Discussion

PHIL 1200 MCC The Utility Monster Wireless Philosophy Video Analysis Discussion

Question Description

After watching the “Wireless Philosophy” videos regarding Utilitarianism, please state (in about 3-4 sentences) whether you believe Robert Nozick’s “Utility Monster” thought-experiment presents a serious problem for Utilitarianism. Please explain your reasoning

Reading Review

Note: Response for Reading Review questions should be at least three complete sentences in length!

1. How does Mill respond to those who refer to Utilitarianism as a swinish doctrine? (Hint: See section 3)

2. How does Mill distinguish between higher and lower pleasures? (Hint: See Section 4.)

3. How does Mill explain the fact that some people choose lower pleasures over higher pleasures  even though they might be capable of both? (Hint: See Section 5.)

Our Service Charter

Format and Features

Our Advantages

Useful Links

1. How does Mill respond to those who refer to Utilitarianism as a swinish doctrine? (Hint: See section 3)

2. How does Mill distinguish between higher and lower pleasures? (Hint: See Section 4.)

3. How does Mill explain the fact that some people choose lower pleasures over higher pleasures even though they might be capable of both? (Hint: See Section 5.)