Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

How It Works
Order Now
glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

FIN 3604 USF Thai Government Intervention & The Exchange Rate of Baht Essay

Writing,

Writing,

FIN 3604 USF Thai Government Intervention & The Exchange Rate of Baht Essay

Question Description

I’m working on a business Other and need an explanation to help me learn.

Global Citizens Assignment Rubric

Global Citizens Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1.1: reached the right conclusion
0.5 pts

Full Marks

 0 pts

No Marks

0.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ1.2: DiscussionExplain correctly and logically whether the intervention effort by the Thai government constitute direct or indirect intervention.
1 pts

Exemplary

Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material

 0.75 pts

Highly Acceptable

Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material

 0.5 pts

Acceptable

Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used

 0.25 pts

Somewhat Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence

 0 pts

Not Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2.1: reached the right conclusion
0.5 pts

Full Marks

 0 pts

No Marks

0.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ2.2: DiscussionExplain correctly and logically the intervention by the Thai government constitute sterilized or nonsterilized intervention and the difference between the types of intervention
1 pts

Exemplary

Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material

 0.75 pts

Highly Acceptable

Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material

 0.5 pts

Acceptable

Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used

 0.25 pts

Somewhat Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence

 0 pts

Not Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3.1: reached the right conclusion
0.5 pts

Full Marks

 0 pts

No Marks

0.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ3.2: DiscussionExplained correctly and logically which type of government intervention (sterilized vs. nonsterilized) would be more effective in increasing the value of the baht
1 pts

Exemplary

Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material

 0.75 pts

Highly Acceptable

Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material

 0.5 pts

Acceptable

Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used

 0.25 pts

Somewhat Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence

 0 pts

Not Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ4.1: reached the right conclusion
0.5 pts

Full Marks

 0 pts

No Marks

0.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ4.2: DiscussionExplain correctly and logically what would happen to the U.S. levels of inflation, if the Thai baht is virtually fixed with respect to the dollar
1.5 pts

Exemplary

Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material

 1 pts

Highly Acceptable

Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material

 0.75 pts

Acceptable

Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used

 0.3 pts

Somewhat Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence

 0 pts

Not Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used

1.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ5: DiscussionDiscuss the potential disadvantages for Thai levels of inflation associated with the floating exchange rate system that is now used in Thailand
1.5 pts

Exemplary

Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material

 1 pts

Highly Acceptable

Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material

 0.75 pts

Acceptable

Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used

 0.3 pts

Somewhat Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence

 0 pts

Not Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used

1.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ6: DiscussionDiscuss what will happen to the Thai baht’s value when the swap arrangement is reversed later
1 pts

Exemplary

Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material

 0.67 pts

Highly Acceptable

Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material

 0.5 pts

Acceptable

Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used

 0.2 pts

Somewhat Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence

 0 pts

Not Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQ7: DiscussionSuggestions to Mr. Holt with regard to Blades’ business in this circumstance
1 pts

Exemplary

Knowledge: Comprehensive, in-depth and wide ranging; Understanding: Outstanding ability to grasp concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Excellent mechanics, sentence structure, and organization; Application/ Analysis: Grasps inner relationship of concepts, Excellent use of a wide range of supporting material

 0.67 pts

Highly Acceptable

Knowledge: Up to date and relevant; Understanding: High level of ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Significant mechanics, structure and organization; Application/Analysis: Demonstrates the ability to analyze and synthesize, independent analysis, good use of a range of supportive material

 0.5 pts

Acceptable

Knowledge: Relevant but not comprehensive; Understanding: Some ability to conceptualize essential ideas and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Some grammatical lapses, uses emotional response in lieu of relevant points; Application/ Analysis: Informed commentary with some evidence of genuine analysis; some supportive materials used

 0.2 pts

Somewhat Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited relevance/some accuracy; Understanding: Minimal awareness that external concepts exists; Writing skills: Lack of clarity, poor presentation of thinking; Application/ Analysis: Lacks evidence of critical analysis, poor use of support evidence

 0 pts

Not Acceptable

Knowledge: Limited superficial knowledge/response; Understanding: Limited ability to draw out concepts and relate theory to practice; Writing skills: Poor grammar, weak communication; Application/ Analysis: Some observations, some supportive evidence used

1 pts

Total Points: 10

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Executive Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Executive Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Executive Papers is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Executive Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
Free resources
 
Dissertation help
 
Email
support@writeship.com  
Executivepapers.org ©2021 All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy